beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2015.09.04 2015재고단7

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a maximum of one year and six months and one year and one year and one year under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch. On April 30, 2013, the parole period passed on July 8, 2013.

1. Habitual theft;

A. On October 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a studio studio studio that was parked in the instant studio parking lot; and (b) took cash amounting to KRW 1,400,000, which was owned by the victim D in the said car, and stolen it.

B. On January 201, 2014, the Defendant opened a door that was parked on the front of the road at the time of the Buddhist Gyeongsan-si, E, and cited KRW 50,000 in cash owned by the victim G and stolen it.

C. On January 201, 2014, the Defendant opened a door that was parked on the front road of E in the following sub-paragraph (b) of Article 2, which was parked on the front road at the time of the Buddhist Gyeongsan-si, and cited 5,000 won in cash owned by the victim G and two live factorings that could not know the market price, and stolen them.

On February 4, 2014, around 04:00, the Defendant opened a door that was parked in the vicinity of the citizens of the Hasan-si, Seosan-si, and cited KRW 300,000 in cash, which is one of the victims I and stolen it.

E. On February 13, 2014, between 19:30 and 02:32, Feb. 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened a door that was parked in the studio parking lot of No. 1, which was parked in the studio studs of No. 1; and (b) laid down a door that was parked in the studio parking lot of No. 1, the Defendant used a copy of the No. NAC card, the victim D.

F. On February 13, 2014, between 19:30 and 02:32, Feb. 14, 2014, the Defendant opened a door that was parked in the J of Seosan-si, Seosan-si, and opened a door that was not locked by the Kystren Tues Tues Tue, and cited the amount equivalent to KRW 11,000 in cash owned by the victim, and stolen it.

As a result, the Defendant habitually stolen the property owned by each victim.

2. The stolen credit cards; and