2. The judgment of the court below seems to have recognized the crime of this case and it seems that Defendant A and Defendant B agreed to the victim's new card company and the victim's new credit card company and deposited considerable money to the Samsung Card company. However, the crime of this case is not likely to commit the crime of this case because the defendants purchased the goods using a credit card reproduced by the defendants and provided them to its members, the act of purchasing goods, driving, wind, etc. using the reproduced credit card, which is systematically and systematically organizedly reproduced by taking into account the criminal law and the contents of the crime, and it is not very good to commit the crime, and it is necessary to punish the defendants. The damage acquired by the defendants exceeds approximately KRW 70 million,00,000,000, and Defendant A took part in the crime of this case by taking advantage of the forged credit card and resident registration certificate, and Defendant A did not commit the crime of this case by taking advantage of the age of 16 years and the circumstances of the crime of this case's imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is without merit and Article 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.