However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant had been present at the meeting as a witness of the victim, and had the victim make a false statement in relation to the larceny case of Goyang-gu District Court 2013 Manhap149 against C (the Defendant’s children).

On September 2013, the Defendant asked D to give KRW 1,50,000 to any coffee shop located in Gyeyang-gu, Goyangyang-gu, Goyang-gu. The Defendant asked D to offer a false testimony for D to offer a false testimony, by requesting D to offer a false testimony. The portion of receiving money, such as basic living cost, is to collect money together with D, not to collect money, but to collect money and requesting D to give a false testimony. C asks D to offer a false testimony to E. The portion of receiving money, such as basic living cost, is not known.

However, in fact, D did not request C to sell home appliances, such as television owned by D, and C had arbitrarily stolen home appliances, and D had not charged C with KRW 8020,000,000,00,000, such as basic cost of supply and demand for living, and D had been directly witnessed that C used to read “D to punish money with a certain condition” for E.

D, however, around 14:00 on December 11, 2013, at the jurisdiction of 501, Goyang-si District Court 501, Goyang-dong District Court 201, at the jurisdiction of the Republic of Korea, present at the court as a witness for the theft against C, etc., and take an oath, and then, the presiding judge of the first criminal department of the court under the jurisdiction of the case, following A’s teachers, the Defendant C requested the Defendant C to sell one television for 42 persons who own the witness, one air cooling, one electronic heating, one kimchi, and one kimchi cold for kimchi. From December 21, 2012 to February 20, 2013, we did not have any fact that the Defendant C had to obtain 8020,000 won over 11 times, and did not have to give money to C. 30,000 won.