When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 06:10 on November 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the Korean telecommunication network located in the Dan-dong, Kimhae-si, and (b) on the ground that the Defendant and the victim C (the 60-year-old age) had been late at the shift working hours of the (ju), Dong-dong-dong-si Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong, and the Defendant raised an aggregate of the fage at the victim’s left chest 3, which is the victim

(2) The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the Defendant’s act against the victim is merely a passive defensive act, and thus constitutes self-defense or legitimate act. However, according to the evidence duly examined and adopted by this court, the Defendant’s exercise of force against the victim is not limited to a simple defensive act to defend an unjust attack, but also has the nature of an attack. Thus, the above assertion cannot be accepted)

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.