손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Plaintiff A, which constitutes the following additional payment order.
1. The reasoning for this part of the court’s establishment of liability for damages is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Scope of damages.
A. The following facts can be acknowledged, based on the following facts: (a) evidence Nos. 4, 7, 12, and 14; (b) evidence Nos. 2; and (c) evidence Nos. 2; (d) evidence Nos. 14; and (e) evidence Nos. 14; and (e) evidence Nos. 4, 7, 12, and 2; and (e) evidence No. 11
(Calculation's convenience period shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded. The present price calculation at the time of the accident of the amount of damages shall be governed by the simple interest rate which deducts the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month. (i) Personal information on the daily income (i) the date of the accident, the date of the time of the accident, and the date of the entry, and the period of the operation: (ii) the following "basic matters";
(As of July 4, 2017, the physical appraisal date at the first instance court’s commission, 3.26 years, which amount to 25% of the life expectancy as of July 4, 2017. / [Basic Matters] Case Number A 2017Na40928, Type A’s gender (i.e., male 1, female 2) sexual injury (i.e., the 69 years old 1, female 2) and 3.26 years, birth date H-10-10-105 maximum working age (tax) as of April 19, 201, the date when the accident occurred, 2014-10-31, 2020-105 maximum working age (tax) 60 days, and 2005-06-11, the Plaintiff lost her entire ability to work due to the instant accident.
However, the plaintiff A suffered from her Hemal brain disease before the accident of this case, and the shore was already real name.
The appraiser of the first instance court deemed that the king's contribution to the disability caused by the accident in this case was 20%, and appraised the rate of loss of labor ability in the real name of the unit, which is another subsequent disability, as 25%.
However, the real name of the Coordinate is the case.