However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant frequently found the “F” 103 Goyang-gu E. 103 operated by the victim C and D at any time and 30 clocks with the beer, and the rest of the beer have been changed to the fact that all the other beers do not have any food sme, has broken off the truth, assaulted the victim D with a knife, and prevented the victims from entering the above header, and has been bullying for a long time.

피고인은 2014. 5. 21. 19:35 경부터 같은 날 20:25 경까지 위 호프집에 다시 찾아와 술을 달라고 요구하였으나 거절당하자, 피해자 D에게 “ 내가 생활보호 대상자로 나라에서 130만 원을 받고 생활하는 사람인데 너 때문에 벌금 100만 원 나오고 깜 빵 생활하게 되었다.

나 깜 빵 들어갔다 나온 다음에 반드시 너를 장사 못하게 만들겠다.

두고 보자! ”라고 말하면서 피우던 담배를 피해자 D를 향해 던지고, 피해자 C에게는 “ 인터넷에 다 올려서 이 가게 망하게 할 테니까 안 하나 하나 지켜봐! ”라고 말하는 등, 약 50분 동안 위력으로 피해자들의 치킨 집 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not more than five years;

2. Whether the sentencing criteria are applied: It is a small and ordinary concurrent crime.

3. The suspension of the execution of two years during the eight-month period of imprisonment with prison labor for the decision of sentence (the background, method and result of the crime, the defendant agreed with the victims at the trial stage of this case, and the defendant is in Grade ゲ with visual disability;