If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On November 21, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) was negligent in failing to verify the rear side of the said car while driving the Eschton car before the convenience point in the operation of the victim C, which is located in the wife population B, on November 21, 2015; (b) thereby damaging the repair cost of approximately KRW 1,369,000 by shocking the front part of the said car with the outer glass window of the said D convenience store.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages is a holder of Esch Rexroth car.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, on November 21, 2015, the Defendant operated the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance before the D convenience stores located in the wife population B at Young-si around 07:56 on November 21, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, on-site map, and on-site photographs;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to tea inquiries and mandatory insurance inquiries;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of damage to duties and actual property), Article 46 (2) 2, the main sentence of Article 8, and the selection of fines for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;