beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.1.20. 선고 2016고합856 판결

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)부착명령

Cases

2016Gohap856 Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (13 years of age)

Minor indecent act by compulsion)

2016.Saccincia33 (Joint Attachment Orders)

Defendant Saryary attachment order

Claimant

A

Prosecutor

Orscop (prosecutions) and Kim Jong-sung (Trial)

Defense Counsel

Attorney B (Korean National Assembly)

Imposition of Judgment

January 20, 2017

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The request for the attachment order of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Facts charged and facts constituting grounds for attachment orders;

[Facts of Prosecution]

On April 25, 2016, at around 09:25, the defendant and the respondent for an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") found the victim D (or 5 years of age) in front of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Borrowing, and found the victim D (or 5 years of age) from the back of the victim himself/herself, and she humbly humbly humb humb humb humb humb humb humb humb humb humb humb humb hum

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim under 13 years of age.

【Fact of Grounds for Attachment】

On December 12, 2014, the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine of 15 million won for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a minor under the age of 13) at the Seoul Central District Court, but again committed the instant crime on at least two occasions, and the Defendant is found to have been guilty of committing the instant crime. According to the doctor’s opinion at the hospital’s attention, there is a high risk of repeating the instant crime.

2. Determination

According to the records of the death diagnosis report bound in the records of this case (Submission on January 9, 2017), since it is recognized that the defendant died on December 20, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case should be dismissed by decision pursuant to Article 328(1)2 of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, the public prosecution of this case shall be dismissed by decision in the case requesting an attachment order, and the request for the attachment order of this case shall be dismissed pursuant to Article 9(4)2 of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge shall be changed.

Judges Kim Gin-han

Judges Park Jong-ok