When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 8, 2013, around 00:40 on May 8, 2013, 200: (a) the Defendant and C’s active duty servicemen D, who were active duty servicemen, were in the line of combat uniform, and (b) the victim E and F, were to put the horses “56 pages.”

Accordingly, C was an assaulting assaulting the face of E and F by drinking, and the defendant was an assaulting the F face once by drinking.

As a result, the Defendant and C jointly inflicted injury on E, such as “highly highly highly highly highly high-level trauma,” and “F to receive a 14-day medical treatment,” respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each testimony of witness E and F;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Ethic and F photographic;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., and Article 2 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine) of the same Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel on the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of the workhouses asserted that the defendant only made a fighting at the time and did not cause any injury to the victim F.

The victim F made a statement at an investigative agency to the effect that the defendant first fighting at the time when the defendant fighting was fighting at the time of drinking (on the face of 81), and that he also fighting at the time of being investigated by the police (on the face of 81), in this court, he stated that the fact at the time when the police was investigated at the police was made, and that the victim E was faced with face even though it was not memory, and that the victim E was fighting with the defendant at the investigative agency. The victim E made a statement to the effect that the defendant was fighting at the investigative agency, although it was not well memory in this court, it was true that the defendant was pushed, and that the defendant was tight and that the defendant was faced with F.