For the victims C et al. who were in a common-friendly relationship with the Defendant, the fact is false that the Defendant resided in the 25th square type room of the Da apartment at the early 25th square of the Gu apartment at the Seocho-si, but was living in the 47th square room. As such, as if the Defendant owned a building equivalent to KRW 1 billion at the market price in Seoul, the Defendant was suffering from excessive disability by making a false statement, etc., which used the victim’s reliance on the Defendant’s false self-reliance and used the victim’s reliance interest and continued to lend money.

1. The Defendant, around July 16, 2012, lent only KRW 30 million to the victim in a mutually influence restaurant in the Seocho-si, Seocho-si.

In the context of the cumulative liability of the Defendant, including the amount of KRW 600,000 per month, the Defendant, as restaurant staff, and the amount of KRW 13,00,000 per month, provided that the Defendant was able to pay the principal and interest of KRW 30,000 per month.” However, even if the Defendant used the money borrowed from the victim for the purpose of living expenses, other debt repayment, and spouse hospital expenses, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to fully repay the principal and interest of the money, even if he/she used the money borrowed from the victim for the purpose of living expenses, other debt repayment, and spouse expenses. The Defendant, by deceiving the victim on July 16, 2012, received KRW 30,000 from the victim to the Defendant’s Nonghyup Bank account, and acquired the Defendant’s building transferred KRW 100,000,000 to the Defendant’s No. 300,000,000 per month prior to the first apartment on September 3, 2012012.

The issue at issue refers to the purport that the monthly interest shall also be reduced.

However, the facts did not own a building equivalent to one billion won in Seoul, and the principal and interest should be repaid for the same reasons as the above paragraph 1.