2. The circumstances are favorable to the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, that there is no record of criminal punishment for the same crime, and that he must support the mother.

On the other hand, the fact that the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is not high, and the damage is not recovered at all is disadvantageous.

In full view of the above circumstances and the facts that there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, all of the factors indicated in the arguments in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, means and consequence of a crime, and the scope of recommended sentences based on the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act: Provided, That the “the pertinent legal provision on the facts of crime 1.” of the 2th page 13 of the judgment of the court below is obvious that it is a clerical error in the “Article 25(1) of the pertinent Act and the choice of punishment for the facts of crime 1.” Thus, it is obvious that