However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those engaged in driving of scenarios vehicles.

피고인은 2014. 8. 13. 21:18경 아산시 명암리에 있는 트라팰리스 앞 길을 명암리 방면에서 갈산리방면으로 위 승용차를 운전하여 진행하게 되었다.

At the time, it is night and its location is an intersection with a lot of vehicle traffic, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to see the front door well and to prevent the accident by properly manipulating the steering direction and the brakes.

Nevertheless, if the defendant neglected to do so and passed a bypassing the car while driving the car at a central line, the defendant was driven by the victim D(the age of 46) who was driving in the opposite side of the direction of the defendant's driving due to negligence that failed to properly operate the steering and steering devices and failed to see the right side of the car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the chills that need to be treated for about two weeks, and suffered injury to the victim FF (32 years of age) who was boarding the franchising car, respectively, for about two weeks of medical treatment. The franchising caused damage to the franchising 400,948 won to repair the car, and escaped without taking appropriate measures such as providing relief to the victim, etc.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement) provides that the Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) above, shall take the victim's shock while escaping from an accident as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1), and then the police officer called out, at around 21:56 of the same day, shall cross the Defendant from the border G of the Asan Police Station belonging to the Asan Police Station, cross-round 21:56.