If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Around December 18, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face side part of the victim’s lives by blocking and not turning on the ecop vehicle of the victim D (37 Dop) driving without any reason, on the street, around 20:50, 2015, in front of the “C Jeongcheon-gu Seoul Central District Department” located in Seocheon-gu B, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul.

2. After assaulting D at the same time and place as above in paragraph 1, the Defendant damaged the said vehicle by cutting off the driver’s seat of the victim F vehicle owned by the victim F by breaking it by breaking it.

3. Around 21:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault against the police station located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu G, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul; (b) the Defendant, who was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an offense and was transferred to He and was in custody in the H district; and (c) the police officer belonging to the Seocheon-gu Police Station, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, that was taking care of the Defendant during the atmosphere of a new soldier.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to I and D;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (list 6,15);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 38 (1) 2 of the same Act concerning the aggravation of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the circumstances favorable to the defendant (a confession, a serious reflective crime, a primary crime, and a contingency crime under the influence of alcohol, the victim D did not harm the defendant's drinking, the degree of damage is minor, and the police I want the defendant's wife.