2. The fact that the Defendant had been sentenced to 20 times more than that of the Defendant, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for habitual fraud at the Incheon District Court on January 16, 2014, which was sentenced to 8 months, and was sentenced to 4 months later on July 21, 2014, and the term of imprisonment has expired and 4 months have not yet elapsed, and the damage has not been completely recovered. The sentence imposed by the lower court is the lowest amount of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines (one to two years, and six months), and no new circumstance was presented in the first instance trial to change the sentence of the lower court, and it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable because it is too much unreasonable, considering all the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant argument, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.