A. In April 2013, the Defendant operated a trade name “D” (hereinafter “instant store”) at each real estate listed in the separate sheet of real estate leased by C (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from the end of April 2013.

B. However, on October 29, 2013, the Defendant prepared and rendered to the Plaintiff a letter of intent to waive all rights to the instant store.

At the time, the Defendant agreed to deliver the instant real estate and each of the corporeal movables listed in the list of attached corporeal movables (hereinafter “instant corporeal movables”) to the Plaintiff, and to transfer the lease deposit claim amounting to KRW 10,000,000 on the instant real estate owned by C to the Plaintiff.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 (No. 3) and Eul evidence (the evidence No. 2) and Eul evidence 2 (the whole purport of the argument as a result of witness E's testimony and appraiser F's appraisal), Eul evidence 4, witness E's testimony and the whole purport of the argument

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate and the instant corporeal movables to the Plaintiff in accordance with the agreement made on October 29, 2013, and notify C of “the Defendant to the Plaintiff on October 29, 2013, that “the Defendant transferred the claim for return of the lease deposit amount equivalent to KRW 10,000,000 to C.”

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.