사증발급거부처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The contents asserted by the Plaintiff in this court are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and the judgment of the first instance court that held that the instant disposition did not abuse discretion in violation of the principle of proportionality even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was reviewed together with the evidence submitted in the first instance trial.
Therefore, the reasoning for the court's reasoning of this case is as follows. Article 9-2 of the 7th judgment "Article 9-2" is used as "Article 9-2," and Article 3-2 of the 3th judgment of the first instance.
In addition to the following cases, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Supplementary Use]
B. 1) In order for an administrative agency’s refusal of a certain person’s active filing of an appeal to constitute an administrative disposition that is the subject of an appeal litigation, the filing of the application must be an exercise of public power or an equivalent administrative action, and the refusal should cause any change in the applicant’s legal relationship, and the person should have the right to file an appeal in accordance with the relevant law or sound reasoning, which requires that person’s refusal of such action should be subject to the right to file an appeal.
In addition, the existence of the right of an application, which is a prerequisite for recognizing the disposition of refusal, shall be determined abstractly by examining, in a specific case, the applicant's interpretation of the relevant laws and regulations without considering who is the applicant, and it shall not mean the applicant's right to obtain the satisfactory result of the acceptance of the application beyond the right to respond just to the application. Thus, if a person files an application, which becomes the basis for the application.