2. The following facts are considered: (a) the Defendant recognized his mistake and divided; (b) the Defendant’s family members are leading the Defendant; (c) narcotics-related crimes are favorable to the Defendant; (d) in terms of social harm and the risk of recidivism; (c) the Defendant is highly likely to be subject to criticism by committing each of the instant crimes without any reflective behavior despite the same kind of criminal records; (d) the Defendant did not merely provide them for a simple medication; and (e) the Defendant did not take into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the background, mode, frequency, age, character and conduct of the instant crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc.; and (e) other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the records, such as the background, mode, and frequency of the instant crime; and (e)

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.