If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On July 22, 2011, at around 15:25, the Defendant, at the G University located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, made a false statement as if he/she had the intent or ability to pay taxi expenses to the victim H before the G University located in the F, and thereafter, the Defendant was unable to pay KRW 9,300,00 of the taxi expenses, even though he/she arrived at the closing point of the Gambol Village bus located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gangseo-gu, the destination of which was located, for failing to pay the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on taxi expense receipts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;