beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.01.26 2016고합51

뇌물공여

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B’s imprisonment for eight months, Defendant C’s imprisonment for a fine of KRW 15,00,000, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a public official of Grade VI in local administration who works as the head of the Eup office of the L Gun Office from January 21, 2015, and Defendant B is a public official of Grade VI in local administration, Defendant C is a public official of Grade VI in L Gun as the head of the Gu, Defendant D is a public official of Grade VI in L Gun as the head of the Gu, Defendant D is a person who served as a police officer in charge of transportation in the L Gun office, etc., Defendant E is a person who operated P in the P in the Center and maintained F-friendly relationship after becoming aware of F as the head of L Gun guard at the time of the local election in 2014. Defendant F is a person who works as the head of L Gun guard from July 1, 2014 to the date of the final approval.

1. Defendants A, B, D, and E’s joint crimes committed by Defendants A, B, and C, who are public officials of Grade VI in the LA administration, continued to talk with the head of LA to the effect that Defendant A, who was the head of LA’s office, would be able to be promoted in the second half of 2014, even though Defendant A, who was public officials of Grade V in the Administration of Grade V in the second half of 2014, was first in the order of promotion candidates of Grade V in the administration of Grade V in the second half of 2015, and was omitted in the officer’s promotion in the first half of 2015, Defendant A conspired to deliver KRW 30 million in cash to the above F.

Defendant

A around March 6, 2015, at the entry of R Q Q, delivered paper bags containing KRW 30 million, which were prepared in advance, to Defendant C through Defendant C, and Defendant D received them and delivered them to Defendant E on the same day.

On the other hand, around October 15, 2014, Defendant E opened a Telecommunication Account under his wife S’s name and gave F with the check-up card connected thereto. On March 6, 2015, Defendant E issued money received from Defendant D to F by depositing it into the said Telecommunication Account on the same day.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to act as a bribe with respect to the duties of F who is a public official.

2...