If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[Criminal Power] On May 31, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million at the Suwon District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On November 20, 2019, at around 22:45, the Defendant driven a DNA-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con-con

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Investigation report- Cases of request for appraisal and replys; and

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing summary orders;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant committed a second offense despite the fact that the Defendant had been subject to punishment once due to drunk driving; (b) the blood alcohol concentration is very high; and (c) the fact that the Defendant was somewhat poor after his enforcement; (c) the Defendant acknowledged the crime; (d) the Defendant was not involved in a traffic accident; and (e) the fact that the said person was subject to a fine; and (e) the said person was not guilty of a fine; and (e) the fact that there was no other serious criminal record, etc. are considered favorable to the Defendant; and (e) the judgment