If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On March 28, 2017, from March 29, 2017 to March 22:00, the Defendant, who violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, arranged commercial sex acts by employing female employees E from the “D Maga area” located on the 3rd floor of Bupyeong-si C and 3rd, and by allowing them to engage in commercial sex acts by receiving KRW 100,000 per hour at the expense of commercial sex acts.

2. No person who violates the Educational Environment Protection Act shall establish and operate a new or variable business establishment, such as telephone rooms, adult PC rooms, and resting telecom, corresponding to the business publicly notified by the head of a female family, in a school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone;

Nevertheless, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was engaged in the business of providing services that are likely to engage in physical contact with, exposure to, etc. to, or similar conduct with, unspecified customers by installing a sealed and sealed space in the aforementioned “D Magaz” located within approximately 200 meters from “G kindergarten located in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A H statement;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on field enforcement photographs and NAV maps (the distance measurement between G kindergarten -D Mazines);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the point of arranging commercial sex acts), Articles 16 (1) and 13 of the Act on the Protection of Educational Environment (the point of operating a business in an educational environment protection zone) concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) recognizes and reflects the Defendant’s mistake.

It seems that the operation period has a short and substantial operating profit.

Defendant’s control.