보상금등지급신청기각결정취소
1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).
1. Facts that there is no dispute over the details of the disposition [based for recognition], entries in Gap evidence 1 through 5, 8 through 12, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings;
A. From March 30, 1972 to May 31, 1977, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) was appointed from May 31, 197; from May 29, 1970 to January 31, 1976; from May 29, 1970 to January 31, 1976; from November 7, 1972 to May 29, 1978; the Selection D from March 30, 1972 to May 31, 197; and the Selection E from August 29, 1968 to May 31, 1972 to a military unit for active duty service, and was receiving special education and training related to the activities that require a sacrifice for the purpose of collecting special contents and forms, etc.
B. The designated parties filed an application with the Defendant for the payment of compensation, etc. pursuant to Article 10(1) of the Act on the Compensation for Persons who performed Special Military Missions (hereinafter “Specialized Employment Compensation Act”).
Accordingly, the Defendant rendered a decision on October 28, 200 to pay 100,516,300,715,570, 102, 190,000, 102, 102,190,000, and 108,383,740,740, and 490, to the Selection on November 7, 2006, on the ground that the Selection constitutes “the person who received education and training related to the special duties” or “the person who received education and training related to the special duties” under Article 2(1) of the Act, Article 4(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, and Article 4(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, respectively, to the Selection E on October 28, 2006. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 19803, Nov. 28, 2006; Presidential Decree No. 19350, Nov. 16, 2006>
(hereinafter referred to as "the previous decision on compensation in this case") shall be made to pay each of the above compensation to the designated parties.
Compensation, etc. for the previous decision on compensation in this case was calculated by adding the amount obtained by deducting the amount paid at the time, and the additional charges for delay in the payment to the amount remaining after deducting the amount paid at the time, pursuant to Article 12 (1) [Attached Table 1-2] and Article 12 (2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Compensation for Special Cases, to
A.