채무부존재확인
1. The insurance contract mentioned in the attached Table 2 with respect to the insured events listed in the attached Table 1.
The principal lawsuit and counterclaim claims shall be judged together.
1. Basic facts
A. A. Around January 16, 2009, the Plaintiff, an insurance company, concluded an insurance contract listed in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with B, and agreed to compensate within the limit of KRW 100 million pursuant to the “Terms and Conditions for Family Life Compensation Liability” for damages arising from a sudden accident attributable to B himself/herself, C, or D’s daily life.
B. On June 27, 2012, at around 19:30 on June 27, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought to stop driving the bicycle traffic section of a road for the combined use of bicycles and pedestrians (the bicycle traffic section and the pedestrian traffic section are separated by the surface marking; hereinafter “instant road”) located below the Busan Urban Railroad 1st, Busan Urban Railroad; (b) at the same direction, the Defendant was trying to stop driving the Defendant’s bicycle traffic section adjacent to the traffic direction of pedestrians at the same direction while driving the bicycle at the same direction, and was able to avoid collision with D with the Defendant’s bicycle, while driving the bicycle at the same direction, the Defendant tried to stop driving the bicycle at the side of the direction of the bicycle traffic; (c) was going beyond the left side of the river, and was able to cut down the 5th part lower part of the water table of the left side
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
On the other hand, D had been playing in the said hot spring spring spring spring, along with C who is the father, but C was in the left side of the road of this case, which is opposite to D at the time of the instant accident, as it was based on the Defendant’s bicycle running direction.
[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 5, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, Eul evidence 6-1, 2, and 3, Eul evidence 6-2, Eul evidence 6-3, Eul's testimony and video, fact inquiry results against the head of the Geumcheon-gu Busan Metropolitan Government of the Busan Metropolitan City, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole arguments.
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiff's assertion (the ground for the main claim) of this case.