beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.06.20 2014고합47

강도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, separate entry Nos. 2, 3, and 5 are as follows.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery, etc. in this court, and the judgment was finalized on March 7, 2014.

The Defendant: (a) as of the date of completion of manufacturing, the Defendant: (b) inducedd the male who drinks alcohol with a view to preparing monthly rent, living expenses, etc. to a lodging room by having the male who drinks alcohol; (c) discovered the password of a card, such as a credit card, etc.; and (d) decided to lose the mind by using the so-called “stroke stroke,” which is a stroke, a stroke, etc., that he prescribed by the Defendant, so as to drink the so-called “strokeing” manufactured after drinking; and (c) took the cash or credit card, etc. in his possession, etc. to withdraw cash with the said card.

1. A robbery Defendant, at around 18:40 on January 15, 2012, approaching the victim D (the age of 45) who drinks alcoholic beverages in front of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and flown alcoholic beverages at KRW 40,00 (the age of 45), can do so.

In the indictment of March 5, 2013, stating the following as follows: “In order to have the victim lose the mind by drinking in accordance with “manufacturing alcohol” prepared in advance by inducing the victim under EM 203 near the victim, but does not lose the mind: (a) in order to prevent the victim from resisting the victim’s eye by drinking, she shall take one e-mail card of our bank, which is the victim’s possession of money on the part of the victim; (b) after checking the password of the said card from the victim, she taken off one e-mail card, which is the victim’s possession; and (c) from the time when she took the above card, she took the above card’s password, and (d) from March 5, 2013.” However, in light of the list of crimes, etc. attached to the indictment, it is evident that it is clear that it is a clerical error in the indictment of “61,00 won,00 won,00 won,” as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

considerable amount of money and valuables has been taken by force.

2. The Defendant of theft: (a) around January 15, 201, around 19:36.