beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2011.01.13 2010고단94 (1)

해양환경관리법위반

Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. Co-defendant I Co-Defendant 1 is a corporation established for the purpose of maritime transport agent business and owns J (oil tanker, 4,206 tons). Co-Defendant 2 is the captain of J, who is responsible for the overall duties related to the vessel. Co-defendant L is the first class mate and the cargo manager of J, who is in charge of oil transfer business and directs the operation of oil transfer business. Co-defendant L is the first class mate and the cargo manager of J, and Co-Defendant 1 is the third class mate of J, who takes charge of technical acts of oil transfer work, such as opening a valve of each tank and locking oil transfer work. Co-defendant Ma is the third class mate of J, who is in charge of oil transfer work with the crew and takes charge of the technical acts of oil transfer work.

Defendant

E Co., Ltd. is a company established for the purpose of refining and selling petroleum, and is a corporation dealing with hazardous substances within the boundaries of an open port, such as supplying petroleum products, etc. sold or intended to be transported with n at Seosan City to oil tankers. Defendant D is the marine shipping team of the E Co., Ltd. and the chief of the marine transportation division and division of the E Co., Ltd., approved by the head of the OO-Maritime Port Authority, who supervises the safety management officer to place safety officers in order to prevent marine pollution and other accidents when loading and unloading hazardous substances, such as petroleum products, etc., within the open port, and implement safety management measures. Defendant C is the chief of the above maritime shipping and the wharf shift department of the E Co., Ltd., who takes charge of all affairs at the port of this case, and takes appropriate measures to prevent marine pollution by supervising whether the ship workers and on-site workers were employed at the designated location, and whether there is any problem in the progress of loading and unloading work. Defendant A and Defendant B are the safety manager at the port of this case at the time.