However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

A. Definite Defendant: (a) 16:00 on June 2, 2017, the victim F of the king Police Station E box sent out after receiving a report from 112, among many people, such as D, restaurant employees, customers, and finites, at the C cafeteria located in Doang-si B, the Defendant: (a) 16:00; and (b) 112, he/she was sent to the victim F. of the king Police Station E box, which was called out by the Defendant after receiving a report.

Rabro Mabro Raba Mabro

whether or not;

C. The head of the guych flab will be identified and flab.

개새끼! 씨 발 놈!” 이라고 욕설을 하여 피해자를 공연히 모욕하였다.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date and time, at the place, and the circumstances leading up to the police box, G, etc. to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender committing a crime of insult, thereby intending to board the Defendant for the patrol vehicle, shot up the patrol vehicle’s door, and killed.

개새끼들아! ”라고 욕설을 하면서 바닥에 엎드리며 피고인의 머리를 바닥에 찧어 머리가 피가 흐르도록 하고, 순찰차의 문을 머리로 들이받고, 경위 G이 이를 제지하며 수갑을 채우자 피고인의 머리에 흐르는 피를 입에 머금은 다음 경위 G의 팔과 몸에 뱉는 등 경찰관의 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to G and F;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., reflective points);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;