However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 22, 2020, from around 00:30 to 01:00 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by entering the victim’s “D convenience store” under the influence of alcohol and without any justifiable reason, and without any justifiable reason, the victim respondeded to the victim “I need to pay the amount of money, but I need to pay the said money.” The Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by stoppinging the victim’s disturbance on the ground that the victim again respondeded to the “I am unable to know why I am unable to speak.”

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim C, who was under cleaning the floor at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as seen above, with the victim C, who was under cleaning the floor at the time and place where the victim was in a disturbance, as “I am off and mascke,” and the victim was pushed the victim by hand, and had the victim be faced with a team subsequent to the vessel.

3. The Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 on the road prior to the “D convenience store” as stated in paragraph (1); (b) the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as: (c) he was able to get home from F, who was urged to go home from F, and was going to go home from F, and (d) he was trying to get a vehicle or f, and (d) the Defendant said that the Defendant was “to go home to the patrol lane.” (c) The Defendant said that the Defendant was “to go to the patrol lane.” (d)

The Defendant opened a patrol car (vehicle No. G) which was stopped at that place while stating that “I would not board the patrol vehicle,” and damaged things used by public offices for the purpose of maintaining the repair cost equivalent to 12,870 won within the patrol vehicle.

4. On May 22, 2020, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the Defendant: (a) received the said 112 report from the “D convenience store” and was solicited by the Defendant F to return home on several occasions from the Defendant F, who was called out after receiving the said 112 report.