If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On October 12, 2015, the Defendant paid the auction price with C and accepted the auction price under the name of the Defendant, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership on November 23, 2015. However, on the above forest land, the victim E, a corporation, installed a container stuff and claimed a lien, and the said land was not delivered.

On April 19, 2016, around 15:00, the Defendant discovered CCTV installed at the entrance of F, an employee of the victim company, at the entrance of the said CCTV, and the victim company did not have the right to exercise the right to retention of the said CCTV, thereby impairing the utility of the CCTV by selecting the main electric wire of the said CCTV.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Partial statement of the witness F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on-site inspection and victim's statement);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on probation;