A. On June 25, 2004, the Mayor of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government established and publicly announced a master plan for urban and residential environment improvement, designating one unit of 280 Geum-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul as a district unit for housing redevelopment, and on October 9, 2006, the head of Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul as a district unit for housing redevelopment improvement, designated and publicly announced a 280 large scale of 64,768.3 square meters (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”) as a rearrangement zone.

(Public Notice No. 2006-348 of Seoul Special Metropolitan City).

On January 26, 2007, the Defendant obtained authorization for the establishment of the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant rearrangement Project”) from the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “head of Seongdong-gu”) for the purpose of implementing the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant rearrangement Project”) for the rearrangement zone, and completed the registration of incorporation on February 2, 2007, and the Plaintiffs own the real estate in

The target area: 66,571.80 square meters for the period from the date of authorization for project implementation to 48 months: 243,757,540,00 won for the site area: 53,149.70 square meters (lease 2,350,000 square meters): 8,863.48 square meters (lease 382.79 square meters): 193,35.34 square meters (lease 9,867.27 square meters): 16.69% (Lease 16.29%): 22.92% (lease 164.15%) for the number of households of housing units divided into 22.92% (lease 213.15%) for 144.979.84.8484,84.164,61466,714,794,714,794,714,714,7164,7

C. On September 21, 2007, the head of Seongdong-gu Office approved and announced the Defendant’s project implementation plan (hereinafter “the initial project implementation plan of this case”) on September 21, 2007 (No. 2007-76 of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Notice), and its main contents are as follows.

Then, the defendant announced the period of application for parcelling-out from September 22, 2007 to October 31, 2007, and the plaintiffs filed an application for parcelling-out within the above period of application for parcelling-out.

Since then, the cadastral rearrangement of some land in the rearrangement zone of this case, the change of the subjects of rental housing and housing relocation expenses.