However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Power of crime] On May 4, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving on Drinking) at the Suwon Friwon.

[Criminal facts]

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of B Poter cargo vehicles.

On September 18, 2020, the Defendant proceeded with a two-lane road in the direction of C in the case of the urbanization of the competition around 19:08, along the two-lanes from the lower intersection to the non-intersection.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating devices, such as a brake, steering device, steering device, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence of driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, received from the victim D ( South, 55 years old) who was under the influence of alcohol at the front of the vehicle, the back part of the vehicle of sod, which was driven by the victim F ( South, 36 years old) who was under the influence of the vehicle, and due to the shock, got the back part of the G K7 vehicle of the G K7 vehicle driven by the victim F (North, 36 years old) who was under the influence of the vehicle of this case to the front part of the vehicle of the said AW.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as the 11st to the right side of the cage cage, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim F, the victim H (the remaining, the 29 years old), and the victim I (the remaining, and the 33 years old) for each of the two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving the B Poter under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.102% of alcohol level from the 1km section from the roads near the Namyang Eupn-ri, Namyang-do, in the event that the city-to-day competition as described in paragraph (1) was made, to the places described in paragraph (1) 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the provision prohibiting driving of drinking or refusing to measure drinking under the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1...