2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

At around 06:30 on August 13, 2013, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim on the ground that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value, and on the ground that the Defendant was dispatched to the Defendant after receiving a report from the Diplomatic Police Station Dental E, F, and the said slope F, the Defendant would calculate the drinking value, and then the Defendant would be able to hear from the owner, employee, etc. of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.