If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On July 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was found in the above restaurant on the ground that: (b) the victim C and the victim D couple operated together at around 20:17 on July 18, 2016, “A” restaurant operated by the victim C and the victim D couple engaging in the work of delivering food to Obane; and (c) the Defendant was obvious that he would conflict with the vehicle driven by the Defendant, and (d) the Defendant got about 10 minutes of “I Chewing, I am delivery.”

The sound, such as commenting “,” she frightened a part of the E, walked with the victim who was frightened, frightened with the victim who was frightened, and frighted, she frightened with the victim, and she frightened out of the delivery fright, and prevented the victims from delivering the fright of the delivery fright, etc., and led the customers who were frightened in the said restaurant to take out of it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victims' restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of examination of witnesses C and D among the protocol of four-time public trial;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. On the argument of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant asserts that he did not interfere with his business by taking a bath or assault, etc., but the record (in particular, the witness E’s statement by the witness E, in the court, filled the Defendant, and brought him to the key to the Oral Sea as he gets out of the string, the string, the string, the string, the string, the string, the string, the string and the string of the 2nd floor restaurant.

If the State does not prevent the operation of the State or local governments

“A witness E’s legal statement is credibility in that the Defendant, even though he made a statement with his attitude to see the Defendant, did not give any particular response thereto.)

According to the results, the defendant tracking E's offland and arrived at the above restaurant, and Obama.