However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 12, 2018, at around 17:45, the Defendant sought the “D” office operated by the victim C (year 51) in Seogugu, Daegu, for the reason that the victim was satisfying. On the ground that the victim was satisfy in the “D office” office operated by the victim, and the Defendant used 15cm length of 15cm, which is a dangerous thing used when the victim was satisfy, and when the victim was satisfyd and was satisfyd, and then found at the above place again, the Defendant threatened the victim by stating that the victim was "

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from shots);

1. Application of the statutes governing suspect photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act include batteriess, which are dangerous things for the defendant, and intimidation the victim. The fact that the nature of the crime is not good, and the defendant has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime is disadvantageous.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case and repented his mistake, the fact that the defendant appears to be a contingent crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, means and result of the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined.