2. Although the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the crime of this case is against others even though the defendant is not a person handling narcotics, it is deemed that the defendant received or purchased psychotropic drugs from others and administered them. Narcotics-related crimes are highly harmful to society and the risk of recidivism, and the defendant has been punished several times as punishment for the same crime, and the defendant has already been punished several times during the repeated crime period of the same crime, and there is a very high risk that the crime of this case is very heavy and high risk of recidivism. In full view of the fact that the defendant's receipt, purchase, and administration of the defendant's quantity and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and his counsel's allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.