사기
All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.
1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because of the punishment (two years of suspended sentence and eight hours of community service order in prison in August) declared by the court below, which is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the above punishment is too unfasible and unfair.
2. We examine the reasoning of the judgment and the prosecutor together.
On the other hand, while there are circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, the amount of the fraud is deposited in the victim, the amount of the criminal punishment is without the history of criminal punishment for the same crime prior to the instant case, and there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, the amount of the fraud is not substantial, and the victim is getting strong punishment against the defendant, and there is a disadvantage to the defendant. Furthermore, considering all kinds of sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, criminal background, motive and motive, means and consequence, relationship with the victim, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is appropriate, and it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.