beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고단369

국가유공자등예우및지원에관한법률위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant 2015 Madan369 was living together with the Defendant’s father C who received veterans’ benefits from the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs on August 4, 2014, and the said C died on or around August 4, 2014. In mind, the Defendant concealed the death of the said C and received the said veterans’ benefits.

When the Defendant died on or around August 4, 2014, the Defendant reported the death of C to an administrative agency and reported the death to the Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs immediately, and received KRW 8,385,000,000 from the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs by means of hiding the fact of death, such as not notifying the fact of death in the vicinity, and pretending that C is alive by means of treating the body of the Defendant and the wife of the Defendant and the Defendant in advance on the new wall, and without reporting the death of C, the Defendant received KRW 1,182,00 from the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs to the post office account (D) in the name of C on September 5, 2014, from that time to March 13, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant received veterans' benefits by fraud or other improper means.

Around March 9, 2015, the Defendant stated “C” in the name column of the delegating authority to issue a certificate of seal imprint, and “E” in the resident registration number column, “E” in the name of the “E,” and “three copies” in the name of the said C, which was prepared in advance following the name, and forged one proxy certificate of seal imprinted in the name of C, a private document for the certification of seal imprinted by the said C, which is a private document for the certification of seal imprinted by the Defendant, and, in other words, it was exercised by a public official in charge, who may not know the forgery at the seat, presented the forged letter of proxy to the public official, as if it was a document formed with a genuine copy of a document, for the purpose of exercising the right despite his/her death on August 4, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

(b).