손해배상(기)
1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 20,000,000 and its KRW 6,500,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 4,00,000 from November 30, 2017.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates the cosmetic (hereinafter “Plaintiff beauty room”) in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, and the Defendant is a person who resided in an apartment near the Plaintiff beauty room and became aware of it as a customer in the Plaintiff beauty room.
B. Around November 2017, the Defendant covered the Plaintiff’s cosmetic, covered the softener, and obstructed the Plaintiff’s chest by force. Around November 2017, the Defendant met the Plaintiff’s chest with the Plaintiff’s own hand, and the Plaintiff got only once by force.
C. On April 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) found the Plaintiff’s beauty room under the influence of alcohol; (b) reported to the Plaintiff and the police officers called “I do not want to go to go to the doer; and (c) damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by stating the false fact at the place where the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff were dispatched.”
Around 15:00 on December 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) followed the Plaintiff, who was on coffee at the Plaintiff beauty room, by the Plaintiff’s own hand, led the Plaintiff to the indecent act by force.
E. At around 12:40 on January 5, 2019, the Defendant: (a) talked with the Plaintiff and the Defendant at the Plaintiff beauty room to “the water tap of Plaintiff beauty room under the influence of alcohol”; (b) made a talk to the Plaintiff; (c) made a talk to the Plaintiff; and (d) made a walk to the Plaintiff.
Accordingly, the plaintiff was required to return home to the defendant.
However, the Defendant again obstructed the Plaintiff’s beauty room business for about two hours by finding the Plaintiff’s beauty room as well as the Plaintiff with a large sound, making the Plaintiff hump the disturbance, and allowing D et al. to make a protest to the Plaintiff.
F. Around January 16, 2019, the Defendant is a person who resides in the same Dong with the same apartment as that of the Defendant and is not a person with the same name.
In the case of interference with the business of subsection (1), the plaintiff's honor was damaged, and the Dong resident in name was made to find the plaintiff and to make a claim against the plaintiff by falsely stating that "the plaintiff was about to repair his water supply, but he was punished by reporting his business interference."
G. The defendant is each of the above.