However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, on July 31, 2017, 2017, 05:02, driving a vehicle at a drinking condition of 213 mn. 48 m. between the 213rd and south 20mn, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, 05: (a) caused a traffic accident under which he was killed, and then gets out of the vehicle, he was called up on the spot and called up at the 112 report; (b) the circumstances leading up to the police box of the Seopo Police Station B, who was called up to the site and was demanded to take a drinking test by Ra; (c) whether he was under drinking;

The bitch fluorb fluorb fluor, fluor, is fluor.

“In doing so, she was flicked on the floor by putting C’s bat on the floor by hand, and flicked his face with a hack.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officials.

On July 31, 2017, 2017, the Defendant 2683, while under the influence of alcohol, driven a rocketing car at a point 213 48 mn. south and south of 48 m., and seated red on the face, etc. on July 31, 2017

In the event that there is a reasonable reason to determine the person, and even though C has received a request for the measurement of drinking by the police station C during the process of the life safety of the Seocho Police Station and the police box attached to B, "I have driven drinking."

The term "" and "C" did not comply with a police officer's request for alcohol alcohol measurement without justifiable grounds, such as breathing C's breath.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 2458"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s written statement “2017 Height 2683;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the situation of a driver of a vehicle driving, report on the detection of the driver of the vehicle driving, and register of the user of the measuring instruments;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident scene photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Articles 148-2(1)2 and 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act, and each choice of imprisonment with prison labor, for the crime;

1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes (the punishment shall be increased by concurrent crimes with the punishment determined by the obstruction of the execution of heavier official duties, but the lower limit shall be the same.