A. C and D, June 12, 2001, issued a promissory note with a face value of KRW 70,000,000 at the face value with the Plaintiff as the addressee. On the same day, a notary public, as the document No. 124 of 2001, signed a notarial deed with a view to recognizing the compulsory execution of C and D (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”).

B. On June 8, 2010, the Plaintiff made the No. 40,000,000 won a notarized bill of this case as the title of execution, and received the claim attachment and assignment order (hereinafter “instant assignment order”) regarding “The claim for refund of deposit amount of KRW 40,000,000 paid by D and C from the Defendant for the lease of the second floor from the Defendant’s building F on the ground of Seoul Northern-gu Seoul Northern District Court KRW 201,0143 (hereinafter “instant real estate”). The said claim attachment and assignment order became final and conclusive on June 30, 2010 after being served on D and C as the debtor on June 10, 2010.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s attorney’s power of attorney is 1) The attorney lecture, which appears on the date of pleading in this case where the Plaintiff’s assertion and made oral arguments as the Defendant’s agent, is not delegated to the Defendant. Thus, the above attorney-at-law has no effect of pleading at the date of pleading. 2) The attorney-at-law shall, in advance, pass through the local bar association to which he belongs when submitting a letter of appointment of counsel or power of attorney, etc. as to legal cases or legal affairs to the public agency (Article 29 of the Attorney-at-Law Act), the law firm shall perform its duties in its name and appoint a lawyer to be in charge (Article 50(1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act).