beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.06.09 2016고정667

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 18, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. on November 18, 2015 and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 26, 2015.

On July 2014, the Defendant intentionally induced a traffic accident with C, D, E, F, and G, and attempted to receive insurance money from an insurance company by forging as if the traffic accident occurred.

When the Defendant intentionally delivers a traffic accident to H after the date of the foregoing gathering, the Defendant would receive insurance proceeds and take part of the insurance proceeds.

Now, H consented to the proposal above.

C, E, and F, along with G, was driven by C on July 16, 2014 at around 20:15, and was driving ahead of the K K cafeteria in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul. H driven 7 LS car, and intentionally concealed the back portion of the said KS7 car.

C, D, E, and F reported, along with G, as if a traffic accident occurred frequently with the victim's modern sea insurance company covered by the said LS 7 passenger vehicles via H, and then received KRW 531,630 from the injured party on July 17, 2014 as the substitute compensation, KRW 526,450 under the same name, KRW 528,260 under the same name, KRW 526,970 under the same name, KRW 526,970 under the same name, and KRW 958,000 under the same name, and KRW 958,000 as the substitute compensation and the substitute compensation.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with C, D, E, F, and H, by deceiving the victim as above, and received KRW 3,071,310 in total from the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against D, E, F, or C;

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. A H statement;

1. Report on internal investigation (as to the statement made by the suspect D), investigation report (as to the suspect D phone recording and investigation);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to documents to be submitted by insurers and documents to be submitted by insurers;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;