성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강간)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight years of imprisonment).
2. The Defendant is the first offender, and all of the instant crimes are recognized, and his mistake is against himself.
However, the crime of this case is very bad because the defendant committed several indecent acts, similar rapes, or rapes on several occasions for a long time against the victim who is a father of his spouse in de facto marital relationship.
As a result, the victim suffered a life-free wound, and the mother of the victim was also suffering a huge mental impulse.
Nevertheless, there was no measure to recover damage.
In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, all the sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.