However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 24, 2017, at around 01:10, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s main shop business by having the victim undergo a disturbance by getting the customers who were under the influence of alcohol in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, by having the victim D engage in an indecent act against female customers and singing them with the microphones of customers who sing their singing, and the employees F of the said main shop stop the Defendant, and by having the said F and the customers control the Defendant, the said F and the customers “he must sing out” while making the beer’s disease on the floor, and going against the disturbance by getting the customers who were in the relevant place, and not putting them out on the floor, and thereby obstructing the victim’s main shop business.

2. The Defendant, by avoiding disturbance as above at the time, at the time, at the places specified in paragraph 1, committed assault against the victim D (the 60-year old-old-old-year-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-in-child-old-in-law-old-in-law-old-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-

3. The Defendant who obstructed the performance of official duties at the same place on the same day, received a report of 112 business owners D, and arrived at the site by G District Guard H, etc. of the Daegu East Police Station at the same place on the same day, and thereafter D requests the Defendant to leave the main place.

In response to the request, “Is the death and death roots,” and Has the Defendant by threatening D as the floor was put into the hands, Is the Defendant. “Is the desire to see Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY YY YY YY YY YY YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y, and H arrests the Defendant as an offender

Upon notification, H's right direction was assaulted by three-time walking cars.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to H, F, and D;

1. A report on internal investigation (attaching images of damage H caused by the victim);