When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a business owner who operates celburher in Ulsan Nam-gu B.

On February 13, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 20,000 as a substitute fee and provided a place for sexual traffic by means of substituteing the above cel 307, even though he knows that he/she attempted to engage in sexual traffic in F and G, who are employees of D entertainment tavern in the above cel.

The Defendant, including that, from January 16, 2014 to February 13, 2014, arranged commercial sex acts for the 92-time business by providing a place for commercial sex acts, such as the written list of crimes, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 1,840,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of H by the prosecution;

1. The protocol of examination by each police officer against the F, E, I, and J;

1. The prosecutor's statement to K;

1. Each statement of F, G, K, and J;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigative reports, on-site photographs, conference accommodation books, photographs, customers and sexual traffic women's access pictures, CDs;

1. Application of investigative reports (specific criminal proceeds) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following facts: (a) there is no previous conviction in the sentencing of the sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) there is no record other than the crime; (c) the fact that a mistake