beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.03.22 2017노8171

명예훼손등

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant, around October 1, 2014, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by referring to “I received contact from a person who is called I” and referring to “I,” although there was no victim’s husband F and his employee G in the office of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Co., Ltd., Ltd., without having been contacted by dial-a-related partnerships.

B. Violation of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) [2016 Height 3125] The Defendant, from around July 2014, posted a letter stating that the relationship with the victim, who had been working in a virtual store operated by the Defendant, helps the victim criticizes one another on the Internet homepage, and fluencing the relationship with the victim, and started to criticize the victim by creating a one-time gram account called “O” (hereinafter “instant account”) around April 2015.

The Defendant connected to the above account on August 1, 2015 and posted food photographs in Qu located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P, thereby referring the victim to R and sexual assault.

It is unbroomed to the complainant of the "Seman and child case" which has been reported with a false complaint and reported, and "It is necessary to do brain as many thoughts and brain ties."

누구처럼 조만간 조목조목 인스타 할 예정이 예요!! 야식 먹으로 나왔는데 사람이 많았어요

Iser Doz. Doz. Doz.

고요 일요일인지 알아서 올레!! #N 관전자 아니고 참 전자로 지냈던

D. In considering the second month's back, R is organized and arranged with a focus on the finding of an injection at present in which R is engaged in the inciting, manipulating, and scriptive of the Dasch Rexroth quality, and is not the “Article 15(1)(1)(b).”

피드쓸께요 불토! #T #Q #Q# 너 같이 살쪄# 개밥 라면 토 나와” 라는 글을 게시하여 정보통신망을 통하여 공공연하게...