When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives BCR 110 Oral Ba.

On July 15:40 on July 7, 2014, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol at a window of the mutual fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, was under the control of drinking driving on the right side of the island far

The Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the breathm from around 16:25 of the same day to around 16:45 of the same day on three occasions from around 16:25 of the same day.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test by avoiding it without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 2, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448, Apr. 2, 20

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;