beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.01.15 2016구합9379

손실보상금

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 4,062,50; (b) KRW 37,475,800; and (c) KRW 14,509,600 to Plaintiff C; and (c) respectively.

Reasons

The project approval process and the name of the public announcement of the project: Goyang-si Urban Development Project (E District Urban Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the "Projects"): The public announcement of Goyang-si public announcement on March 22, 2013, G public announcement of Goyang-si public announcement on December 9, 2014, HH public announcement of Goyang-si on January 23, 2015, and Goyang-si public announcement on October 6, 2015: The commencement date of expropriation of the land by the defendant Gyeonggi-do Land Tribunal on December 28, 2015: The land indicated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. A (hereinafter referred to as "each land of this case"), and the compensation for each land of this case, other than the land indicated in the list of annexed lists No. A, the Central Land Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "land of this case"), and the compensation for each land of this case, other than the land owned by the plaintiff and the land appraisal corporation No. 2 through 67, and the plaintiffs No.

Plaintiff

A: Plaintiff B: 449,687,500 won: Plaintiff C: 829,464,00 won for 4,319,615,600 won: L Co., Ltd., Ltd. and M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Objectioned Experts”; hereinafter “Objectioned Experts”) [Grounds for Recognition]; Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4; Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 1 (including each number); the summary of the Plaintiffs’ assertion of the purport of the entire pleadings (hereinafter “court appraiser N”); the appraisal result of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of the entire pleadings (hereinafter “court appraisal”); the land category and use of each of the of the instant lands are different; and the land category and use thereof are different from each other; and land Nos. 2 through 5 and 5.