A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates Blogs under the name of “C” on the Internet.

B. Around 04:00 of the F date, the writing on the Plaintiff was posted as “E” on the bulletin board of the daily storage (www.be.com) of the Internet community site on the date, and the Defendant written and posted the comments “G” under the name of “G”;

C. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant as a crime of insult, and the Defendant sent the Defendant to the Ulsan Family Court as a juvenile protection case (Ulsan Family Court 2014.53), and the said court received a decision on protective disposition.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1’s video, purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant publicly insultings the plaintiff by posting an abstract judgment that could undermine the plaintiff's social evaluation or a statement expressing the plaintiff's anti-scopic sentiment on the Internet website bulletin that enables an unspecified number of people to confirm the contents of the article (the defendant's assertion is without merit since "scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics" used for many unspecified people who scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic s

Furthermore, the amount of consolation money shall be 100,000 won in consideration of all the circumstances shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the content of the comments made by the defendant, the degree of insult, and the reasons why the comments were written.

Therefore, the defendant's obligation to implement the plaintiff's 10,000 won and its performance as from May 18, 2013, which is an illegal act.