beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고합71

현존건조물방화

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

L is a person operating " Q convenience store" located in the 5th commercial building located in the Sinsan Nam-si P, and Defendant A is an employee of the above convenience store.

Defendant

L around January 2016, by demanding the payment of business profits equivalent to approximately KRW 30 million from the head office of the above convenience store, etc., L was under demand for payment of debts from creditors. Defendant A also was under demand for payment of debts equivalent to KRW 15 million due to the traffic accident of the vehicle leased by Defendant L, and it was under demand for payment.

During the process of seeking their addresses and solutions, the Defendants: (a) laid fire in the toilets of “S cafeteria” operated by the Victim R (hereinafter referred to as “S cafeteria”) that is adjacent to the above convenience store and separated from the prefabricated-type panel; and (b) laid down the toilets to the convenience store in the length thereof; and (c) conspired each obligee to demand the postponement of debt repayment.

Pursuant to the above programme, the Defendants purchased about 10,00 won of gasoline in the “U” oil station located in Ulsan-gun T on January 14, 2016 and prepared in advance after purchasing approximately 7 liter equivalent to 10,000 won of gasoline at around 00:06.06.

The results were divided into four parts of the par value soldier.

After that, the Defendants arrived at the above convenience store around 01:31 on the same day, the Defendant L saw the network around the above convenience store, and the Defendant A set up four strings of the strings, which are prepared gasoline, and set up two gasolines on the toilet floor through the window, and attached a stop to the toilet, which was in possession. The Defendants laid off the above restaurant and the above convenience store employees of the above restaurant and the above convenience store, and destroyed the above building by fire so that the amount of repair costs of the above building, such as the Plaintiff V (if the above restaurant and the above convenience store were moved to the entire toilet, 15 years old), the victim W (the age 15 years old), and the victim W (the age 15 years old), were seated at the above convenience store.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and destroyed the existing commercial building in which victims V et al. were located.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.