A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for eight months, each of the defendants B.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is the actual owner of the building D and E in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the defendant B is the owner of the above D and E due to the F's words living together with the defendant A.

Defendant

A In the course of operating a gambling dealer, it is necessary to obtain a loan from the above real estate as security and to prepare operating expenses. However, the above sub-paragraph D contains a false real estate lease contract with the lessee who resides in the rent deposit of KRW 200 million, and the lessee H is unable to obtain a loan because the lessee H resides in the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the above sub-paragraph B around May 2019, and the defendant B requested the male-child offer of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of KRW 20 million by the lessor of the above sub-paragraph 3 years.

On May 10, 2019, at around 13:50 on May 13:50, 2019, the Defendants submitted two copies of the real estate lease agreement in Seoul Mapo-gu J building and K, and to the victim M, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that “No. D and E are KRW 250,000,000 per household price, and each of them is KRW 20,000,000,000 per household, and KRW 280,000,000 per household, respectively.” The Defendants made a false statement to the effect that “No. D and E are leased KRW 140,00,000 per household as security.”

However, the actual lessee referred to in the above sub-paragraphs A and E actually resides in the lease deposit amounting to KRW 200 million in G and H, and the lessee A and I presented by the Defendants were the aforementioned false contract.

The Defendants conspired to induce the victim, thereby deceiving the victim.