청소년보호법위반
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. On August 31, 2014, the summary of the facts charged was as follows: (a) the Defendant, who operates a main restaurant of D in Kunsan-si C, and (b) the Defendant sold to 7,000 china-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, namely, at the time of this case, E, a juvenile, holds the first identification card that is a female 194, F, the J's identification card that is a female 195, G, the 1992, and H, a female 194, respectively. At the time of this case, H presented a personal identification card that is an adult son to the defendant and his employee. At the time of this case, E was not a brupt, and at the time, at the time, was a 165§¯, and was a large letter of her head, and was also a 165§¯, and it was hard to view that it was hard to view that it was a single juvenile hosome, and that it was difficult to see that it was a single juvenile hodry, and that it was a hodry and a single juvenile hodry, and that it was difficult to see that it was a new juvenile hodry.
In full view of these circumstances, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone confirmed that the defendant was a juvenile at the time E, F, G, or H.
There is a reasonable doubt that the alcoholic beverages have been sold under the intention to accept it while recognizing or recognizing the probability of being a juvenile.